Foundation Corona Committee, 77th meeting on October 5th, 2021

Robert F. Kennedy jr. (Children Health Defence, USA)

in conversation with Viviane Fischer and Reiner Fuellmich

(Original language: English)

[Transcript from Team +MK]

Reiner Fuellmich [04:07:46h]
Bobby, a mix up because the time difference, I think you changed the time back for about an hour, but if this is OK with you, you’re going to start right now, if that’s OK. I read your book, by the way.

Robert Kennedy Jr.
Wow. That’s a big surprise, a huge undertaking.

Reiner Fuellmich
Yeah, it’s extremely interesting. You’re focusing on Fauci. It’s a pretty much complete history of what he has been doing, how successful he has been, both with respect to his endeavors and, of course, financially. I think I read that he’s the one public official who makes the most money. He gets like four hundred and forty seven thousand dollars a year. That’s more than the president. Is that correct?

Robert Kennedy Jr.
Yeah, that’s right, and actually it’s interesting because his salary technically should be about 70 percent less than that. But in 2002, out at the anthrax attacks, the Pentagon began funneling huge amounts of money to Anthony Fauci. The Pentagon wanted to do bioweapons development. But they were blocked by the 1972 bioweapons treaty. And the treaty has a loophole, and it says you can do dual use research, meaning if you can, if you can make the claim plausible that what you’re actually doing is developing vaccines or other countermeasures you can legally develop, do bioweapons research. And the Pentagon did not think it could get away with doing that on its own. It began funneling money to Tony Fauci and beginning in 2002, he really became an asset of the bioweapons industry and of the Pentagon. He took on a military function, and at that time they gave him a 68 percent raise that came from the his military involvement and is attached to his military involvement. And that’s one of the reasons he was kind of forced to continue to do gain of function studies, even when everybody was criticizing them and Obama was trying to stop him. He continued to do it because he gets $1.6 billion a year for those kind of studies or essentially military research, bioweapons research. And and his salary comes from that as well. So 70 percent of his salary is attached to that work.

Reiner Fuellmich
There was a halt in the gain of function experiments when I think Obama did it. Why is it that he continued doing this or is it not true that he continued doing this?

Robert Kennedy Jr.
No, he continued doing it. So he began doing these studies around 2000, and he did a study which 2001 after the anthrax attacks, he did a study by a researcher called OKU. And that was the first one, and they took a they took a…. And this actually is a study that should be loved by mice because they took a mouse coronavirus and they taught it to infect only cats. And I was the first time that they had successfully done that. People were even at that time, kind of outraged that they were toying with these kind of alchemy. And then a couple of years later, they funded a study that took the Spanish flu that has been extinct since 1918 and which was killing, you know, one percent of the people who were infected. And and they resurrected it. In other words they built a Spanish flu, a virus, which didn’t exist on the planet at that time. And then there was a giant backlash and it started getting a group of people Richard Ebright from Rutgers and Marc Lipsitch, who are both bioethics experts from Harvard. And they started leading a group saying, what the critics of Tony Fouchier do, is saying: What he’s doing is insane and it is, you know, it’s one of these things that escapes. You will not be able to predict the trajectory. And in 2014, there were three mishaps in oh, eighty five CDC workers were exposed, I think, to smallpox or anthrax. They found a …, they uncovered that somebody found in an unlocked refrigerator in a basement of at Fort Dietrich, a batch of smallpox vials. And then there was another escape, there were three escapes, all publicized in a short period of time. And at that point there was.. . Tony Fauci, there was actually a panel that was supposed be created after they recreated the flu, the Spanish flu. It was a panel that was created that had a Pentagon representative and representatives of each of the agencies within NIH. And then it was supposed to review all function for the risk benefit analysis. Tony Fauci controlled the panel, and he chaired it. He simply refused to convene it. He also picked all the people who are running it, except for the Pentagon people, so he could dominate it. But when these three viruses escaped, he had a mutiny on that panel and they insisted on being convened. And there was. And he ended up firing them. He fired a half the panel. It was called the Saturday Night Massacre. And at that point, the people who had been fired from the panel were convened by Marc Lipsitch at Harvard and Richard Ebright at Rutgers. And they put together three hundred leading scientists in the area, and they wrote a letter to President Obama saying, You got to stop Tony Fauci, and President Obama passed that gain of function Moratorium. While he was passing it Fauci and Collins were fighting him. And they ended up winning a battle where the entire review process would be taken away from that other panel and put completely inside of NIH. And there was also a loophole that they installed that said if they could show, they could demonstrate to themselves, not to anybody else, that this was important for national security, they could continue the studies that Obama had banned. I think there were 18 studies banned, and they immediately restarted at least nine or maybe 11 out of them. It’s all secret, so we don’t know exactly what they were doing and Tony Fauci began shifting his resources to Wuhan to do these studies where they’d be out of sight of the White House and they were laundering the money, it was passing over a british zoologist, Peter Daszak and at the same time the CIA was pumping money into Daszak. So the CIA and the Pentagon were also laundering money for Daszak. So we ended up selling about a hundred million dollars through him, from the Pentagon, from CIA via USA to Tony Fauci. Although his studies were very important, he was only the third largest, he was coordinating with the intelligence agencies and with the military. You know, everything that they did and the weird thing is they somehow convinced themselves that it would be OK. The Wuhan lab is run by the Chinese military, and the Chinese military is very open about what they’re doing is bioweapons research. You know, they don’t make any, you know, they’re not pretending it’s something else. In fact, they published a study in 2013 in China in the Chinese language and explained exactly what they were doing and said this a very exciting area and we can now, thanks to Tony Fauci we now know not only how to make the viruses infect human beings, but also to hide the tampering. Tony Fauci, this is, you know, one of the holes in Tony Fauci’s story, he’s he kept saying, Well, this is about vaccine development. He was funding Ralph Baric at North Carolina to figure out ways to hide the tampering. Ralph Baric called it the no-seeum method, meaning you could create these viruses and through what they call a seamless legation process, you could hide the evidence of tampering. He funded Ralph Baric to develop, Ralph Baric taught Shi Zhengli, the bat lady how to do it. She succeeded in doing it on her own and they had all these Chinese scientists. The Chinese in 2013 published this studcy that says, OK, now with this very exciting new weapons development area, and we can combine other technologies like freeze-dried technologies and to create delivery systems for the bioweapons we’re making. This is all laid out in their report. I think they had 27 authors on this study about how to weaponize coronaviruses and flu viruses by doing these function studies. And they talk about how to, you know when they do get them, they can freeze dried. They have to be, you know have to deliver them at night, you have to drop them over cities at night because the sunlight damages them, you need to take into account the wind patterns and it’s, you know, the Chinese were very open. What we are doing here is weapons development.

Reiner Fuellmich
Why? I mean, after the all of the emails were brought out into the open, it was very obvious for anyone who can read that he was involved in that he was involved in gain of function experiments. Why does he still deny that he’s doing that? Is he, Is he so sure of himself? Is he sure that he’s still going to get the protection that he’s had? Is he so sure that he’s not going to get thrown under the bus or what’s behind this?

Robert Kennedy Jr.
Well, as I show in the book, he’s made a career of lying and getting away with it. And even, you know, during the pandemic, he told a whole bunch of what he considers to be noble lies of unmasked, the rates needed to a vaccination needed to achieve herd immunity. Many, many other things. And he admitted publicly he lied about that. Lied to manipulate the public into doing the right thing. So he has in his brain this, because that he is the only one who possesses the genius to save humanity from these contagions. And he has a right, even a duty to lie and to the public for its own good. So I think that he has a disconnect in his brain where he does not see it and most people don’t want to be manipulated. More importantly, he’s gotten away with it and consistently and away with. The New York Times reported his lies, reported that they were lies and then gave him a ringing endorsement to do it. So I think he feels like, you know, it’s like that and he is not going to get, nobody is going to call him on and so far he’s been correct about that.

Reiner Fuellmich
What about his… Nobody, really, at least outside of the United States, nobody really knew who Fouchier was. He became a prominent figure with the start of the corona plandemic, as I would call it. No, I’m not denying that there is a virus. We know that it can be really dangerous and it can be deadly for some people. But a lot of people, including our friend Judy Michael, which of course, is saying this is a plandemic. How was it that he he has been making a career for so many years? I think it all started, if I remember correctly in 1968 or so. How is it that he was invisible for most of the world? I think even for most Americans, until finally we came to the corona pandemic or plandemic?

Robert Kennedy Jr.
Well, you know, this kind of study and you know, we want to tell you that if he does, that study not only will it never get published because we control the journals. And number two, we’re going to cut you off next year. Well, Tony Fauci gives to Standorf probably a half a billion dollars a year, he gave or Baylor University 300 million dollars a year. NYU, Harvard. All of the medical schools rely on Tony Fauci … as large as. They’re getting that money for drug development. And so Tony Fauci gives them these drugs to develop. And, you know, he developed. Here’s what he does. This is a kind of simplification, but at NIH Labs, he has petri dishes filled with cultures of various viruses, like hantavirus and coxsackievirus and flu, corona virus, etc.. And he’s got scientists there who are dripping drops of certain molecules, poisons onto these viral cultures. And if molecules kill that culture… And he says, OK, here I have an antiviral effective against coronavirus. Now they have to a rat and see if it kills the rat. So it doesn’t kill the rat, but it does kill the virus. And he says, OK, this could be a medicine so then he forks it out to the university. University may do a macaques study, a monkey study, and it recruits people for a phase one study. So they have a 100 people, Tony Fauci gets $20’000 per recruit to the tooth EPRI principal investigator. These are the key people who are the army, the commissars that do message discipline across the globe. When you look at CNN and you see these people like Paul Offit or Peter Hotez or Art Caplan or Stanley Perlman, who come on CNN every night and they’re presented as independent scientists. They’re not, their principal investigators. And virtually every one of them is taking money from Tony Faucior Bill Gates or both of them. So these guys, the principal investigator, is usually a powerful person in the medical school, right? The dean of a department or, you know, the chair of a department. And he’s the one who gets the clinical trials. He runs the lab. He recruits 100 people for this, you know, Tony Faucis drug experiment. And Tony Fauci gave him $20’000 per person. It’s a lot of money. So 50 to 75 percent of that money is skimmed off to the university. So now the university is on the hook to Fony Fauci, they become reliant on that fund. And he goes, does the phase two, phase three. They’re talking about maybe 30’000 people at phase three trial, and they’re giving huge amounts of money. So now he has to bring in the pharmaceutical company. They give half of the patents to the pharmaceutical company, the PI keep some of the patents so he’s now completely dependent on. The university keep’s some of the patent, and that is now their revenue stream. And Tony Fauci may keep some of the patents for himself. He may distribute patent rides to his favorite loyal deputies, and he may keep the patent for the for his agencies out there. Moderna, for example, the Moderna vaccine, Tony Fauci’s agency owns half the patent. It will collect billions of dollars in royalties, Tony Fauci’s also given patent margin rights to between four and six of his deputies and to keep one hundred and fifty thousand dollars a year for life of. This is the system he’s created, and his agency no longer does public health. The only thing it does is drug development, and you can see why. I’ll tell you how pervasive it is: between 2009 and 2016, here are about 240 new drugs approved by FDA, all of them coming from Tony Fauci’s shop. Oh, you know, he is the central incubator for drug development and pharmaceutical, and the pharma companies are his partners. He’s not going to do regulatory actions against them. He’s not going to find problems with these drugs. He is going to promote them. And that’s how you advance in these agencies, by promoting these drugs.

Reiner Fuellmich
Does he himself profit from this or or do we not know anything about this because there’s so much money?

Robert Kennedy Jr.
Look, it’s hard. It’s hard to get that data. We know that, you know, I don’t believe that he does. He I know he owns one patent, at least one patemt on interleukin two, which he kind of, you know, let’s say this is his putting it an uncharitable, but he kind of stole from Frank Ruscetti and Judy Mikovits, you know, who were involved in developing a drug. But he got a patent. He got caught for it because there was a whistleblower in his agency who exposed that around 2004. And there was, you know, it was in the middle of a congressional investigation of Tony Fauci’s experiments on little kids. He did these horrible, horrible experiments where he turned, you know, black and Hispanic kids over to the pharmaceutical companies at foster homes, so that they could they could test their chemotherapy, their chemotherapy, HIV antivirals on these children and a lot of children died. At least 85 kids died in those experiments. Many of them didn’t even have HIV, and this was being investigated at that time. And during that investigation, it became clear that this drug called interleukin, was, he owned the patent for it. So when he left the AP […], Solomon did an article about it. And there was a fear at that time because no American and nobody in Congress knew that HHS was allowing its employees to make to make money on these patents and to, you know, have lock in rates, margin rates on patents of drugs they had worked on. And so Tony Fauci publicly said at that time that, don’t worry, I’m going to give… at that time they, on that patent, they were allowed to keep unlimited amounts of money from it. So Tony Fauci said, Don’t worry, I’m going to donate all the money from this patent, from the royalties to charity. That was the end of the discussion. Nobody has ever been able to find what charity he’s been donating it to. And you know, there are charities and there are charities. There are like Bill Gates, there is something called philanthropy capitalism, which he posed about. But you know, if your charity is your kid’s football team or you know of their high school or private school or whatever or your charity is donating to a college outfit, your gig at the college, you know there’s a million things you can do that are charitable. Nobody’s ever asked Tony Fauci, and he’s never said what he does with that money. And I believe I think it’s probable that that is the only patent because I think after that, because he was caught for it and the […] really bad, I think after that he started using the… Well, first of all, HHS passed and enrolled and said there was a maximum cap of $150’000 a year per patent. And since then, we know he’s been giving patents on these drugs to favored employees, and it’s basically a way to buy loyalty for him.

Reiner Fuellmich
It seems, however, that after the after his emails came out and after he was grilled in Congress by, I think Rand Paul, the tide is turning. Or am I mistaking this?

Robert Kennedy Jr.
Well, I do, I don’t think. Between what’s in my book and what you know, the increasingly inquisitive Republicans in the United States Senate, I don’t think Tony Fauci is going to be there in two years and he may go much faster than that, but it’s not going to get rid of the system, the system is in place. And, you know, getting rid of one guy will help. One of the things that the problems with having Tony Fauci in there is that everybody in the world is terrified of all of these people. I hear people all the time, all the time. And during my research on that book again and again and again, people who are getting money from Tony Fauci or who are in the virology community, in the immunization community, you know, vaccine developers, et cetera, who say, we think he’s corrupt. He is evil here, but he’s over dictum and he’s so powerful that I cannot publicly talk about him. And I think when he leaves, there is going to be a tsunami of revelations that come up from people who have hated him and been injured by him and have seen, you know, the results of his conduct, but have been unwilling to speak up until now because of the, you know, because of the power he wields. You know he and Gates and Farrar, they really are very, very powerful trio and they control. like I said, 61 percent of the biomedical research on Earth is controlled by those three guys and they support each other. Jeremy Farrar was stepped in to lead the cover up of a lab leak. He was the one who was putting together all of these scientists who signed the Nature article in March and The Lancet article in February, and he was involved from day one. And we now know that because we have the e-mails..

Speaker 3
But do you think you felt she was gone? Do you think there would be like 100 little Faucis popping up doing the same thing?

Robert Kennedy Jr.
Of course the whole institutional culture is corrupt? You can’t survive at NIH if you criticize pharmaceutical companies. Oh, you know, Judy Mikovits and Frank Ruscetti are just two of the people you know, whose careers have been destroyed by not just Fauci, but by the institutional pharma dominated culture at NIH. Bernice Eddy, probably one of the most important women scientists at our lab she is one of the most awarded Scientists, say she discovered the poliomyelitis virus. She was uhm… She played key roles in any of the great, you know, discoveries in NIH history in the 50s and 60s, and she discovered that there was a monkey virus in the polio vaccine that was highly carcinogenic, a virus called the simian virus 40, AS40, and it was in 98 million polio vaccines that they were about to give to my generation. And she rang the alarm bells. And said, you know, you’re going to save a few people from polio, but you’re going to give you’re going to kill 50 times that many people from cancer later on. And indeed, my generation has 10 times the soft tissue cancer as the previous generation that did not get the vaccine. And you can’t say that we’re getting it from a vaccine and virus is such a potent carcinogen that today it’s used in laboratories all over the world to induce tumors in rodents. So, you know, you give it to a guinea pig and they just sprout tumors. And that was because part of it, because they shut up Bernice Eddy. They literally moved her into the basement. They changed the locks on her laboratories. They took away her telephone, you know, they ran her out of NIH. The same thing happened with John Anthony Morris, who was for 40 years ran the flu program at NIH, and he came forward and said the flu vaccines are a hoax, and not only that, I don’t think that they’re causing neurological damage. You know, in 1976, when they had the first fake pandemic, and I think this man, I think in my book, I talk about many pandemics that were fake. You know 2006.avian flu pandemics, a 2009 pandemic, and I think I had Wodarg on this call. And he knows, you know, he was the hero of that in exposing that pandemic, that fake pandemic to the world. And then the a pandemic was completely falsified about it, saying that Zakk was causing microcephaly in babies. It was just a hoax. And Fauci, by faking that pandemic, got two billion dollars from Congress to develop a vaccine, which of course, never materialized, of course, because it wasn’t causing microcephaly. And and you know, and on and on, and this is what they do there. And he was the first one. John Anthony Morris was the first one to expose the fake pandemic in 76. And, you know, the head of the CDC ended up having to resign because of that scandal. And that’s when Fauci, that was his first fake, had it because he had come in 68, and by then he was second in command. He was running the lab, the second in command and he was sitting in on the meetings when they met with Merck, and that was the first item that they gave immunity to vaccine companies the first time ever. And it was his boss at that time that, you know, that made those concessions. And so they were all having these secret meetings with Morris Hellman at Merck and Fauci was part of that whole thing. So they’ve been doing that for years and years on. Anthony Morris exposed it in 76, and he lost his job because of it. He was completely exonerated after a decade of lawsuits. It ruined his life. So anybody in NIH who threatens the pharmaceutical paradigm is not just career destroyed, but they are eaten alive. They are marginalized, vilified, gaslighted and just obliterated. They are made examples to the rest of the Fauci community of what happens to you if you if you challenge Tony Fauci or his pharma overlord lords.

Reiner Fuellmich
Well, this is what happened to Judy Mikovits, too. So what’s going to happen? Is it, to us looking at what’s going on in the United States from here, it looks as though this is going to be his last time around, his last turn, so to speak, because it looks as though even the mainstream some, not all of them, of course not. Not The New York Times, but even some of the mainstream media are beginning to ask questions. Probably, in my view, at least due to some of the footage that we’ve seen on the mainstream media of, for example, Rand Paul grilling him and seeing him in a almost, well, he was almost frantic. He was losing it. He was yelling at Rand Paul. Is it that people are beginning to see who he really is? I mean, you describe him as, you are a lawyer, you describe him as a criminal. And I would agree with that after reading what you wrote about him. Is it that the public is finally coming to its senses as far as this man is concerned?

Robert Kennedy Jr.
He’s been, you know, one of my chapters in the book is about Teflon Tony. His capacity to have scandal after Scandal to continually fail upwards throughout his career in terms of any public health metric and yet still have his adulation from the American media. And there’s a bunch of ingredients that explain that. You know, in our country is one of the or only place in the world where a pharmaceutical company is going direct to consumer advertising, pharmaceutical drugs and an ad has… So the pharmaceutical companies spend nine point six billion dollars a year on pharmaceutical advertising and promotion- And a lot of that ends up at CNN and, you know, Fox, ABC, NBC, CBS, they’re dependent on those dollars. And, you know, and so they become really protectors of Anthony Fauci. And that’s one of the things and one of the many, many dynamics, ingredients to that dynamic of why he is bulletproof. If you think about this, the United States had the worst outcomes, the highest body count on Earth during the pandemic. We have 4.2 percent of the world’s population and we had fourteen point five percent of the deaths. We had more deaths than any other country. We are.. Death rates. I have to check that close, they do, you know, vacillate. So I don’t have the exact number now, but about eighteen hundred deaths per million population. You go to African countries like Tanzania and it’s double digits, maybe 50, 60 deaths per million. We had one of the highest death count by almost any metric on Earth. Why is Tony Fauci still in there? He did the inverse of what anybody would do if they wanted to stop the pandemic. He did not give us a medical response to a medical crisis. He gave us a militarized response and a monitized response. He did not, you know, they were not. Look, we know what to do, what you should have done. First of all, Tony Ffauci, he should have appeared on TV and said what Franklin Roosevelt said to us. The only thing we have to fear is fear itself. Do not be scared. We are going to handle this. And then he should have told us, we know that coronaviruses attack people who are low in vitamin D and environment and zinc. Everybody, here’s the levels you should take. Here’s what you should be doing. We know that it’s going to attack people who are obese. So Americans need to lose weight. You need to get outside in the sunshine and you need to avoid foods with chemical residues. You need to avoid sugary drinks. And then instead of doing that, he went out and got the surfers or in the sunshine in a place where coronavirus does not spread, ordered them off the beach into their houses. We know that this, from the beginning from what we were seeing in Italy and elsewhere. This is a virus that spreads indoors. It doesn’t spread outdoors. So why did they lock the entire population indoors? Throughout human history, we have known, are you quarantine the sick and you don’t quarantine the healthy. In China they killed this pandemic by April. China had a two month pandemic, and it was gone. How did they do it? Very aggressively identifying sick people and then quarantining them and treating them. At the beginning of April China had published in Mandarin and other Chinese language medical protocols. Here’s how you treat somebody who has a positive test for coronavirus. You give them chloroquine, which is, of course, a godsend Hydroxychloroquine. You give them antibiotics. You give them, anti-inflammatories, you give them steroids and then a whole bunch of Chinese herbs that contain […], which facilitates delivery of zinc to the cells of vitamin D and all the things we know you should have been doing. Tony Fauci to this day is not published a protocol for treating early treatment. Instead, the people who come forward and say, Hey, I got something that works here, you know ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, those people are punished or silenced, they’re vilified. They’re censored, they’re delicensed. If they’re doctors. Their careers are destroyed for doing early treatment. The Chinese treated people. And now we find out if you treat people early, 80 percent of them don’t go to the hospital. What did Tony Fauci do? He told the people: If you get a positive test, don’t isolate. Don’t go to a quarantine facility and get treated and don’t get treated at all. Go home. To spread the disease to your family and don’t take any treatment until you get so sick you can’t breathe. Then we bring you to the hospital and we give you two things that are going to kill you. Remdesivir and intubation. Two things we know are going to kill you. Remdesivir was a drug which was developed by Ilia, Fauci and Gates. And in 2019. OK, December 2019, it was. This is, you know, a month before he recommends it for oronavirus. It’s it’s the subject of a study of an Ebola clinical trial. So they’re treating people with Ebola in Africa. Six African countries, Ebola kills half the people who have it, and the Safety Monitoring Board stepped in and pulled it from the study and said this drug is too dangerous to give to Ebola victims. OK, it’s too dangerous to kill one of them. The deadliest is in the world, and yet we’re giving it to [tret] Coronavirus. And you know how it kills you. It kills you by shutting down your kidneys and shutting down your lungs the same way that COVID kills you. So those doctors in New York who are killing all those patients, they don’t know if it was Remdesivir or if it was Covid. And what happens when you tell somebody to go home and sit there until they get sick is absolutely savage, barbaric medical response. When they do get sick and come back to the hospital, every one of those million people who went to the hospital, was a superspreader event because they’re infecting their families, they’re infecting the ambulance driver they’re infecting the Uber driver? They’re infecting everybody they see. It was like exactly the inverse of everything we should have been doing, we did. wait. And here’s the other thing that he should have done. Instead of using his relationships with social media to share knowledge about early treatment. He should have said the social media companies, we need to create a grid, a communications grid to hook up to every one of the 11 million doctors in the world who are fighting coronavirus on the frontlines. We need them to report what they’re doing, to tell us what they think works, to talk about their experience and develop a methodology for analytics, for measuring the credibility of all those reports and fine tuning our protocol. Day to day of finding all of the solutions that are working in Argentina and Tanzania and Kenya and Bangladesh and Switzerland and Italy, and talking to all of these doctors who are in care of the patients were figuring out innovative ways to treat these patients and reducing deaths and giving them metrics to measure the effectiveness of their interventions and then reporting it all back and developing in a systematic way very quickly. knowledge of the repurposed medications that seem to be working abroad and giving really honest data tell all of the doctors who are on the frontline in this country and the rest of the. And that’s it, that’s the way you handle a modern pandemic, but that’s not what they did, what they did is they were focusing on social control, on using the pandemic as an excuse for imposing totalitarian controls and telling people not to talk. Shutting down any dissent about the government. Obliterating constitutional rights, religious rights, property rights, jury trials, all the things that due process, all those things they took away from us instead of practicing medicine. They use this then as a coup d’etat against constitutional governance, human rights and democracy across the globe. I got to go on another podcast joke.

Reiner Fuellmich
That’s all right. One piece of information that may be new for you. And of course, we’ll let you go. Today, we spoke to a whistleblower who tells us that there were cases of COVID in the United States starting in July of 2019, and that there was a virtual ban probably issued by Fauci on all of these alternative methods of treatment. We’re going to look deeper into this, of course.

Robert Kennedy Jr.
I mean, I think, you know, from the data that I’ve seen and I know there’s contrary data and there’s, you know, they have these stats where they’re apparently finding it early and sewage treatment plants. But I think that in my view right now, that is that coronavirus escaped around September 12th, and there’s a lot of evidence of that. You know, the aerial photographs of the hurricane was filling up the chatter on the internet. The hospitalization of people from the lab. The Chinese government at midnight and the Chinese government, one end of the Wuhan lab and remove 22000 samples, scrubbed the Internet of Things, algae and all of these kind of function studies. And there was a tremendous amount of suspicious activity that happened on September 12th. And then you had the World Games immediately after that. You know military games with a lot of indicia that the Chinese government at that point was aware that it was spreading. They blocked certain roads where there was a lot of chatter, there was a lot of hospital activity. So my guess at this point is that it probably happened on September 12. But of course, you know, nobody knows

Reiner Fuellmich
What if it really started in the US and then through the military games, it was more or less exported to China. We’ll have to look deeper into this.

Robert Kennedy Jr.
This is exactly the kind of speculation I engage in.

Reiner Fuellmich
Yeah, well, this is what we heard from a whistleblower. We’re going to have to take a deeper look into this. OK, well, thank you very much for taking the time. We’re all going to read that book. All of the viewers will read that book because it’s like it’s written like a crime story and that’s what it is, really.

Robert Kennedy Jr.
Thank you. Thank you.

Reiner Fuellmich
Thank you very much. See you later. Have a great day.

Imprint / Privacy Policy / Contact Send / support

We use cookies to personalise content and ads, to provide social media features and to analyse our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners. View more
Cookies settings
Privacy & Cookie policy
Privacy & Cookies policy
Cookie name Active



Die Betreiber dieser Seiten nehmen den Schutz Ihrer persönlichen Daten sehr ernst. Wir behandeln Ihre personenbezogenen Daten vertraulich und entsprechend der gesetzlichen Datenschutzvorschriften sowie dieser Datenschutzerklärung.

Die Nutzung unserer Webseite ist in der Regel ohne Angabe personenbezogener Daten möglich. Soweit auf unseren Seiten personenbezogene Daten (beispielsweise Name, Anschrift oder E-Mail-Adressen) erhoben werden, erfolgt dies, soweit möglich, stets auf freiwilliger Basis. Diese Daten werden ohne Ihre ausdrückliche Zustimmung nicht an Dritte weitergegeben.

Wir weisen darauf hin, dass die Datenübertragung im Internet (z.B. bei der Kommunikation per E-Mail) Sicherheitslücken aufweisen kann. Ein lückenloser Schutz der Daten vor dem Zugriff durch Dritte ist nicht möglich.

Datenschutzerklärung für die Nutzung von Google Analytics

Diese Website nutzt Funktionen des  Webanalysedienstes Google Analytics. Anbieter ist die Google Inc. 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway Mountain View, CA 94043, USA. Google Analytics verwendet sog. „Cookies“. Das sind Textdateien, die auf Ihrem Computer gespeichert werden und die eine Analyse der Benutzung der Website durch Sie ermöglichen. Die durch den Cookie erzeugten Informationen über Ihre Benutzung dieser Website werden in der Regel an einen Server von Google in den USA übertragen und dort gespeichert.

Im Falle der Aktivierung der IP-Anonymisierung auf dieser Webseite wird Ihre IP-Adresse von Google jedoch innerhalb von Mitgliedstaaten der Europäischen Union oder in anderen Vertragsstaaten des Abkommens über den Europäischen Wirtschaftsraum zuvor gekürzt. Nur in Ausnahmefällen wird die volle IP-Adresse an einen Server von Google in den USA übertragen und dort gekürzt. Im Auftrag des Betreibers dieser Website wird Google diese Informationen benutzen, um Ihre Nutzung der Website auszuwerten, um Reports über die Websiteaktivitäten zusammenzustellen und um weitere mit der Websitenutzung und der Internetnutzung verbundene Dienstleistungen gegenüber dem Websitebetreiber zu erbringen. Die im Rahmen von Google Analytics von Ihrem Browser übermittelte IP-Adresse wird nicht mit anderen Daten von Google zusammengeführt.

Sie können die Speicherung der Cookies durch eine entsprechende Einstellung Ihrer Browser-Software verhindern; wir weisen Sie jedoch darauf hin, dass Sie in diesem Fall gegebenenfalls nicht sämtliche Funktionen dieser Website vollumfänglich werden nutzen können. Sie können darüber hinaus die Erfassung der durch das Cookie erzeugten und auf Ihre Nutzung der Website bezogenen Daten (inkl. Ihrer IP-Adresse) an Google sowie die Verarbeitung dieser Daten durch Google verhindern, indem sie das unter dem folgenden Link verfügbare Browser-Plugin herunterladen und installieren:

Datenschutzerklärung für die Nutzung von Google +1

Unsere Seiten nutzen Funktionen von Google +1. Anbieter ist die Google Inc. 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway Mountain View, CA 94043,  USA.

Erfassung und Weitergabe von Informationen: Mithilfe der Google +1-Schaltfläche können Sie Informationen weltweit veröffentlichen. über die Google +1-Schaltfläche erhalten Sie und andere Nutzer personalisierte Inhalte von Google und unseren Partnern. Google speichert sowohl die Information, dass Sie für einen Inhalt +1 gegeben haben, als auch Informationen über die Seite, die Sie beim Klicken auf +1 angesehen haben. Ihre +1 können als Hinweise zusammen mit Ihrem Profilnamen und Ihrem Foto in Google-Diensten, wie etwa in Suchergebnissen oder in Ihrem Google-Profil, oder an anderen Stellen auf Websites und Anzeigen im Internet eingeblendet werden. Google zeichnet Informationen über Ihre +1-Aktivitäten auf, um die Google-Dienste für Sie und andere zu verbessern. Um die Google +1-Schaltfläche verwenden zu können, benötigen Sie ein weltweit sichtbares, öffentliches Google-Profil, das zumindest den für das Profil gewählten Namen enthalten muss. Dieser Name wird in allen Google-Diensten verwendet. In manchen Fällen kann dieser Name auch einen anderen Namen ersetzen, den Sie beim Teilen von Inhalten über Ihr Google-Konto verwendet haben. Die Identität Ihres Google- Profils kann Nutzern angezeigt werden, die Ihre E-Mail-Adresse kennen oder über andere identifizierende Informationen von Ihnen verfügen.

Verwendung der erfassten Informationen: Neben den oben erläuterten Verwendungszwecken werden die von Ihnen bereitgestellten Informationen gemäß den geltenden Google-Datenschutzbestimmungen genutzt. Google veröffentlicht möglicherweise zusammengefasste Statistiken über die +1-Aktivitäten der Nutzer bzw. gibt diese an Nutzer und Partner weiter, wie etwa Publisher, Inserenten oder verbundene Websites.

Widerspruch Werbe-Mails

Der Nutzung von im Rahmen der Impressumspflicht veröffentlichten Kontaktdaten zur Übersendung von nicht ausdrücklich angeforderter Werbung und Informationsmaterialien wird hiermit widersprochen. Die Betreiber der Seiten behalten sich ausdrücklich rechtliche Schritte im Falle der unverlangten Zusendung von Werbeinformationen, etwa durch Spam-E-Mails, vor.

Auskunft, Löschung, Sperrung

Sie haben jederzeit das Recht auf unentgeltliche Auskunft über Ihre gespeicherten personenbezogenen Daten, deren Herkunft und Empfänger und den Zweck der Datenverarbeitung sowie ein Recht auf Berichtigung, Sperrung oder Löschung dieser Daten. Hierzu sowie zu weiteren Fragen zum Thema personenbezogene Daten können Sie sich jederzeit unter der im Impressum angegebenen Adresse an uns wenden.


Die Internetseiten verwenden teilweise so genannte Cookies. Cookies richten auf Ihrem Rechner keinen Schaden an und enthalten keine Viren. Cookies dienen dazu, unser Angebot nutzerfreundlicher, effektiver und sicherer zu machen. Cookies sind kleine Textdateien, die auf Ihrem Rechner abgelegt werden und die Ihr Browser speichert.

Die meisten der von uns verwendeten Cookies sind so genannte „Session-Cookies“. Sie werden nach Ende Ihres Besuchs automatisch gelöscht. Andere Cookies bleiben auf Ihrem Endgerät gespeichert, bis Sie diese löschen. Diese Cookies ermöglichen es uns, Ihren Browser beim nächsten Besuch wieder zu erkennen.

Sie können Ihren Browser so einstellen, dass Sie über das Setzen von Cookies informiert werden und Cookies nur im Einzelfall erlauben, die Annahme von Cookies für bestimmte Fälle oder generell ausschließen sowie das automatische Löschen der Cookies beim Schließen des Browser aktivieren. Bei der Deaktivierung von Cookies kann die Funktionalität dieser Website eingeschränkt sein.


Der Provider der Seiten erhebt und speichert automatisch Informationen in so genannten Server-Log Files, die Ihr Browser automatisch an uns übermittelt. Dies sind:

  • Browsertyp/ Browserversion
  • verwendetes Betriebssystem
  • Referrer URL
  • Hostname des zugreifenden Rechners
  • Uhrzeit der Serveranfrage

Diese Daten sind nicht bestimmten Personen zuordenbar. Eine Zusammenführung dieser Daten mit anderen Datenquellen wird nicht vorgenommen. Wir behalten uns vor, diese Daten nachträglich zu prüfen, wenn uns konkrete Anhaltspunkte für eine rechtswidrige Nutzung bekannt werden.


Wenn Sie uns per Kontaktformular Anfragen zukommen lassen, werden Ihre Angaben aus dem Anfrageformular inklusive der von Ihnen dort angegebenen Kontaktdaten zwecks Bearbeitung der Anfrage und für den Fall von Anschlussfragen bei uns gespeichert. Diese Daten geben wir nicht ohne Ihre Einwilligung weiter.

Impressum / Kontakt

JAMI Diallo, Länggassstr. 91, 3012 Bern, ​Schweiz

info @




Wir sind freischaffend und unabhängig. Durch deinen Support wird es so bleiben.


Wenn du Uns unterstützen möchtest, hast du folgende Möglichkeiten.


PayPal Logo


Save settings
Cookies settings